The court of appeal has ruled that Mr Justice Williams was mistaken in ordering that the three judges who allowed Sara Sharif to live with her father and stepmother should not be identified.

It comes as three judges involved in historic proceedings related to 10-year-old Sara Sharif, who was murdered by her father ...

Yet to widespread astonishment they were informed in December by Mr Justice Williams that none of the professionals involved, including three judges, could be identified because of 'real risk' of ...

In an unprecedented decision, Mr Justice Williams tried to ban the media from naming Judge Raeside and two others involved in decisions about the care of Sara over fears they would be subjected to ...

We appealed a ruling by Mr Justice Williams last month that no professionals involved in the case should be named because the media “could not be trusted to report fairly”. Yesterday ...

In a controversial ruling in December, Mr Justice Williams said that the media could not identify three judges who presided over a string of historical court cases before the schoolgirl’s death ...

Mr Justice Williams previously imposed an order “banning the entirety of the British press” from naming any family court judges involved in the 10-year-old’s care before she was murdered.

Following the murder conviction of Sara’s father, Urfan Sharif, 42, and stepmother Beinash Batool, 30, Mr Justice Williams banned the naming of professionals in the case including social workers ...